Strengthening Blood Regulatory Systems to Tackle Africa's Unmet Needs for Blood and Blood Products.

Background: Assuring the quality and safety of blood and blood components is an essential element of health care in all countries and requires government commitment and legal frameworks. Ineffective regulation of blood and blood components has far-reaching consequences that are not limited to the affected countries but also have extensive global implications. Summary: In this review, we summarize the work of the project BloodTrain funded by the German Ministry of Health within the framework of the Global Health Protection Programme to strengthen regulatory structures in Africa that are imperative to guarantee the improved availability, safety, and quality of blood and blood products. Key Messages: Intense interaction with the stakeholders in African partner countries lead to first measurable successes in the strengthening of blood regulation, as shown here for hemovigilance.

Suspected adverse reactions reported for blood, blood components, and blood products in VigiBase.

INTRODUCTION: Since being designated as medicines by World Health Organization (WHO), blood components are subject to pharmacovigilance reporting. Using VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), we characterized reports of adverse reactions for all blood products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: ICSRs involving blood products as the suspected medicine in VigiBase between 1968 and 2021 were extracted. MedDRA preferred terms and the International Society of Blood Transfusion haemovigilance definitions were used to stratify adverse reactions. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize ICSR demographics. RESULTS: A total of 111,033 ICSRs containing 577,577 suspected adverse reactions with 6152 MedDRA preferred terms were reported for 34 blood products. There were 12,153 (10.9%) reports for blood components, 98,135 (88.4%) reports for plasma-derived medicines, and 745 (0.7%) reports for recombinant products. The majority of reports (21.0% and 19.7%, respectively) were from patients aged 45-64 and over 65 years. The Americas contributed the most ICSRs (49.7%). Top reported suspected adverse reactions were for the following MedDRA preferred terms: headache (3.5%), pyrexia (2.8%), chills (2.8%), dyspnoea (1.8%), and nausea (1.8%). CONCLUSION: VigiBase already has a large number of reports on blood products. When compared to other existing haemovigilance databases, our study found reports from a broader range of countries and reporters. This may provide us with new perspectives, but for VigiBase to reach its full potential in haemovigilance some alterations in what is captured in reports are required.

Report on the GHPP-BloodTrain online workshop on "Authorisation and Licensing of Blood Establishments - Review of quality documentation of blood and blood components", 5th-8th of July 2021.

The GHPP BloodTrain team developed an e-learning concept in response to the COVID-19 travel restrictions, providing training formats with virtual stages that can be completed during the pandemic (and beyond) and on-site stages, where practical exercises and case reports in smaller groups can lead to a deeper understanding of the content. The virtual training workshop on "Authorisation and Licensing of Blood Establishments", hosted by the PEI GHPP BloodTrain from the 5th to the 8th of July 2021, was the first application of this concept. The number of participants could be substantially increased compared to an on-site event thanks to the virtual setting. Participants came mainly from national regulatory authorities and national blood transfusion services. There were also some Ministry of Health representatives from 19 countries from the WHO regions of AFRO, EMRO, and from Indonesia in attendance. The virtual workshop focused on reviewing and evaluating the quality documentation required for approval of processes used by blood establishments to prepare blood components. Presentations were given by members of the GHPP BloodTrain team as well as by representatives of the German Red Cross. The program was complemented by contributions from the WHO HQ and presentations on country-specific experiences from Ghana and Zimbabwe.

Implementation and performance of haemovigilance systems in 10 sub-saharan African countries is sub-optimal.

BACKGROUND: Haemovigilance is an important element of blood regulation. It includes collecting and evaluating the information on adverse events resulting from the use of blood and blood components with the aim to improve donor and patient safety. We describe the results of the pilot of the integrated GBT+ Blood for the haemovigilance function in 10 sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS: We piloted the integrated WHO Global Benchmarking Tool plus Blood (GBT+ Blood) to assess the haemovigilance function of national regulatory authorities (NRAs) in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Liberia, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Data obtained from documents and face to face interviews were used to determine the status of implementation and performance of the following six indicators; legal provisions regulations and guidelines, organisation and governance, human resources, regulatory processes, transparency and accountability and finally, monitoring progress and assessing impact, by estimating median scores across 20 sub-indicators. In addition, a cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS: The countries showed inter-organisation variability in implementation and performance of the haemovigilance function. The overall median score (all sub-indicators) was 44 % (range: 7.5 % - 70 %). The lowest average performance scores were for the arrangement for effective organisation and coordination (35 %) and human resources (35 %) indicators. The highest average scores were observed for the mechanism to promote transparency and mechanism to monitor regulatory performance indicators (50 % and 60 %, respectively). We identified clusters of best-implemented sub-indicators from the procedures for haemovigilance and poorly implemented sub-indicators from the legal provisions, regulations and guidelines for haemovigilance and human resources. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of sub-indicators and performance of haemovigilance systems varied greatly for all countries with a few countries performing reasonably well in the implementation of some sub-indicators under procedures for haemovigilance. Most countries were poorly implementing sub-indicators in the legal provisions, arrangement for effective organisation and human resources indicators. The legislative provisions in most countries were at a nascent stage. There is a need to set up targeted and customised technical support coupled with prioritised interventions to strengthen the capacities of NRAs.

Report from the GHPP-BloodTrain inspection workshop in Harare the 20th to the 24th of May 2019.

During the training workshop on Inspection of Blood Establishments, which was hosted by the PEI GHPP BloodTrain in Harare from the 20th to the 24th of May 2019, participants from the National Regulatory Authorities from seven Sub-Sahara African countries presented their current experiences related to regulation and inspection of blood establishments in their respective countries. While in all seven countries regulation and inspection of conventional medicinal products manufacturer is performed, the regulatory situation of blood and blood components as well as inspection of blood establishments is still heterogeneous.

Selection of Blood, Blood Components, and Blood Products as Essential Medicines in 105 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Blood products of human origin are essential treatment options for several diseases, for example, hemophilia. We studied the alignment of national essential medicines lists (NEMLs) of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List for the selection of blood products of human origin. The most recent versions of NEMLs from all LMICs were studied for the inclusion of blood products of human origin (blood and blood components, plasma products, and immunoglobulins). Data obtained from 105 NEMLs were compared to the 2017 WHO Model List. The median number of blood products of human origin on the NEMLs was 4 (range: 0-10). Immunoglobulins were most frequently included (73%). Blood and blood components were the least selected products (15%). The uptake of plasma products was around 50%. Nine countries did not have any blood products of human origin on their NEMLs. Some NEMLs included blood products not listed on the WHO Model List (albumin, hepatitis A immunoglobulin, and cryoprecipitate). We observed variation in selection according to WHO region, income level, and year of NEML update. Alignment of NEMLs with the WHO Model List varied greatly for different groups of blood products, ranging from good uptake for immunoglobulins, reasonable uptake for plasma products, to poor uptake for blood and blood components. This heterogeneity in selection and inclusion of blood products of human origin on NEMLs may be partly explained as being due to specific country characteristics, but some of it may not be explained. Policy makers need to rely on evidence in making decisions about which blood products to select, include, and remove on their NEMLs.